Peculiarities of inflorescences morphogenesis in model representatives of the Celastraceae R.Br. in context of molecular phylogenetic data

  • Ivan A. Savinov Moscow State University of Food Productuion, Talalichina str. 33, 109316 Moscow, Russia
  • Andrei S. Ryabchenko Main Botanical Garden named after N.V. Tsitsin RAS, Botanicheskaya str. 4, 127276 Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Peculiarities of laying and forming of inflorescences for model representatives of the Celastraceae are studied. Specific characters in rhythm development of generative elements for different taxa are determined. Morphological markers, which are coincided completely with molecular characters,  are determined. They are evidenced on closely relation between next taxa: Celastrus and Tripterygium, Salacia and Sarawakodendron, Salacia and Brexia.

References

Алексеев Д.В., Ежова Т.А., Козлов В.Н., Кудрявцев В.Б., Носов М.В., Пенин А.А., Скрябин К.Г., Чуб В.В., Шульга О.А., Шестаков С.В. 2005. Закономерности разметки органов цветка Arabidopsis thaliana. Математическое моделирование. Докл. Акад. наук. 401 (4): 570–573.
Кузнецова В.М. 1985. Органогенез вегетативных и генеративных почек в роде Euonymus L. Бюлл. Гос. Никитск. ботан. сада. 57: 31–35.
Савинов И.А. 2012. Уровни организации плода в семействе Celastraceae R.Br. и структурное разнообразие пиренариев в подсемействе Cassinoideae Loes. Mod. Phytomorphol. 1: 161-165.
Савинов И.А. 2013а. Некоторые особенности морфогенеза соцветий в роде Brexia Noronha ex Thouars (Celastraceae). Mod. Phytomorphol. 3: 161–165.
Савинов И.А. 2013б. Морфогенез соцветий и цветков модельных представителей семейства Celastraceae R.Br. в контексте данных молекулярной филогенетики. Систематические и флористические исследования Северной Евразии (мат-лы международ. конф., 12-14 декабря 2013, г. Москва): 191–193.
Coen E.S., Meyerowitz E.M. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31–37.
Coughenour J.M., Simmons M.P., Lombardi J.A., Yakobson K., Archer R.H. 2011. Phylogeny of Celastraceae subfamily Hippocrateoideae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid loci. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 59: 320–330.
Matthews M.L., Endress P.K. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 149: 129–194.
Mu X.-Y., Zhao L.-C., Zhang Z.-X. 2012. Phylogeny of Celastrus L. (Celastraceae) inferred from two nuclear and tree plastid markers. J. Plant Res. 125: 619–630.
Prusinkiewicz P., Erasmus Y., Lane B., Harder L.D., Coen E. 2007. Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316 (5830): 1452–1456.
Simmons M.P., McKenna M.J., Bacon C.D., Yakobson K., Cappa J.J., Archer R.H., Ford A.J. 2012. Phylogeny of Celastraceae tribe Euonymeae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 61 (1): 9–20.
Zhang X., Zhang Z.-X., Stutzel T. 2011. Aril development in Celastraceae. Fedd. Repert. 122 (7-8): 445–455.
Fig. 1. Beginning of flowers laying of Euonymus atropurpureus (19.07.2013): apexes of separated flowers are shown by arrows.
Published
2014-04-01
How to Cite
SAVINOV, Ivan A.; RYABCHENKO, Andrei S.. Peculiarities of inflorescences morphogenesis in model representatives of the Celastraceae R.Br. in context of molecular phylogenetic data. Modern Phytomorphology, [S.l.], v. 5, p. 117-123, apr. 2014. ISSN 2227-9555. Available at: <http://ojs.phytomorphology.org/index.php/MP/article/view/202>. Date accessed: 11 apr. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.161014.
Section
Research Articles